|
Theology
behind Faith
Atonement
An
introductory consideration of what theologians call the Atonement
The
purpose of this page is to provide a Biblical framework for belief in
the atoning work
of
Jesus Christ.
A.
Definitions:
To
atone : to
make amends & reconcile
The
atonement : the redeeming
of mankind and the reconciliation of God with man, brought about
by Jesus' death.
B.
Summary:
Atonement
in the Bible may be described within the following:
1.
Since ‘The Fall' (Gen 3) sin (self-centred rejection of God) is a
characteristic of every human person (this is ‘original sin').
2.
With free will, God had to allow sin, but knew that it would:
a)
create guilt in each person and
b)
separate them from Him.
3.
God's objective was to make it possible for every person to enter
into a relationship with Him whereby sin was not an issue.
4.
The only way for that sin to be obviously dealt with, was for someone
to take the punishment due so that justice was seen to be done and
our ongoing sense of guilt removed.
5.
Yet the problem was who could be big enough to take the punishment
of every person
who wanted that. Answer: His Son!
6.
The phases of this operation were as follows:
i)
To create a nation to demonstrate God's design rules for living
ii)
To show the need of this nation, i.e. their sin, as typical of the
human race.
iii)
To provide a ritual to reveal the holiness of God and the seriousness
of
sin, portraying the eventual work of His
Son.
iv)
To send His Son to reveal His love and then to die a sacrificial
death to
take the punishment due to us.
7.
The outworking of this operation:
occurred at Calvary
outside Jerusalem
nearly 2000 years ago
is required by God to be the focus
of belief for those who would come to
Him, believing that
Jesus is:
the means of their punishment being
dealt with,
the means of their being reconciled
to God,
the means of a life-relationship
with God being created.
C.
Basic Concepts:
1.
The Problem
We all have an inbuilt sense of justice.
Justice means when we are guilty, we believe we deserve punishment.
God is holy, perfect. We know we are not
– we fail. A gulf!
When we feel guilty:
we become very self conscious (Gen
3:7)
we want to hide from God (Gen 3:8)
we become fearful of God (Gen 3:9)
we want to justify ourselves &
blame others (Gen 3:12 -)
To live in relationship with God (which
He wants) there are, therefore, two things to be done:
our guilt to be dealt with (but how
do we make amends?)
our separation from God to be removed
(but how can we be reconciled?)
2.
God's Answer – Old Testament Context
He creates a nation from the family of
Jacob ( Israel )
– Ex 19
They were to stand out in the world –
Ex 19:5,6
Previously He had conveyed this to Abraham
(Gen 18:18 ,
22:18 ,
26:4, a people who would bless the rest of the world), to Isaac (Gen
26:4) and to Jacob (Gen 28:14), a special people (Lev 20:26
)
Isa 42:6, 49:6, 60:3 also conveyed this
about Israel ,
but with some sense of the coming Messiah.
These sorts of references occur right
the way throughout the O.T.
It seems clear that Israel
were to:
reveal God and His ways to the rest
of the world
reveal His design for mankind (seen
through the Law)
so that others would come to God and follow
His design for us.
3.
God's Answer – Resolving the TWO problems
i.e.
to punish the sin and to remove it as an obstacle between us and God.
Within
the Law of Moses, the sacrificial laws:
provided a practical path to follow,
i.e. something to DO
pictured something bigger on God's heart
(that He would do later in history through His Son).
3.1
Prologue: Picture of the Passover Lamb – Exodus 12
God was bringing Judgment on Egypt
in the form of the death of the
eldest son in every home (Ex 12:12
) [see bigger picture – Ex 1-12]
Israel
were told to kill a lamb that was without defect and put some of its
blood on the doorposts of their front doors (Ex 12:1-7)
When God's destroying angel saw the blood
he would “pass over” that home and not judge it (Ex 12:13
)
A lamb was thus the means of averting
God's judgment. John the Baptist later hailed Jesus as “the Lamb of
God” (Jn 1:29 ,36)
3.2
Introducing the Idea of Atonement through Offerings
This was built in via the Law given to
Moses.
Once a year
Aaron shall make atonement … This annual atonement must be made with
the blood of the atoning sin offering (Ex
30:10)
Thus the ‘guilt-separation' problem was
to be dealt with once a year
There was also built in a concept of a
ransom, implying that their lives were forfeit because
of sin and needed buying back (Ex 30:11-16) The ransom money was used
to run the Meeting Place with God.
At God's direction Moses instituted the
DAY
OF ATONEMENT (Lev 16), so that Atonement
is to be made once a year for all the sins of the Israelites
(v.34), a day for general cleansing
of the whole nation.
Burnt offerings
were to be animals without defect (Lev 1:3)
and the person bringing it had to place his hand on its head – by way
of identifying with it, and it with him, and then slaughter it, and
it ‘made atonement' for him (Lev 1:4). The object of the ‘burnt offering'
was for it to act as a sign of the humble approach
of a penitent believer, and as it was burnt it was considered to provide,
an aroma pleasing to the Lord
(Lev 1:9,13,17)
Sin offerings
were similarly to be animals without defect (Lev 3:3) offered as above
(Lev 3:4) but were specifically brought following sin and
so in this manner the sin of the person was seen to be transferred to
the creature which, by way of taking the punishment for the sins, was
then executed.
NB. The distinction between the two seems
to be that the burnt offering was used as
a general means of atonement for members of the sinful human race, but
with no specific sins to confess, whereas the sin offering
was brought as a means of atonement when there was a
specific sin to confess.
The giving of a substitute life was thus
seen as a means of dealing with the sin of the people and of cleansing
them from it (Lev 16:30 ).
Everything involved in the place of encounter
with God had to be cleansed by it because it was contaminated by contact
with sinful human beings. In every way the holiness of God is emphasized.
4.
God's Answer – New Testament Fulfillment
New
Testament teaching:
The law is
only a shadow of the good things that are coming--not the realities
themselves.
(Heb 10:1)
those sacrifices
are an annual reminder of sins, because it is impossible for the blood
of bulls and goats to take away sins.
(Heb 10:3,4)
Christ … has
appeared once for all …. to do away with sin by the sacrifice of himself.
Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment,
so Christ was sacrificed once to take away the sins of many people.
(Heb 9:26-28)
God presented
him as a sacrifice of atonement, through faith in his blood. He did
this to demonstrate his justice, because in his forbearance he had left
the sins committed beforehand unpunished
(Rom 3:25)
He (Jesus)
is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also
for the sins of the whole world. (NIV)
with the page note saying as an alternative “
He is the one who turns aside God's wrath, taking away our sins,
and not only ours but also ..” (1 Jn 2:2)
The NKJV renders this verse: “And
He Himself is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but
also for the whole world.”
Because ‘propitiation' is not a common
word, we need to define it: the removal of wrath by the offering
of a gift
Similarly 1 Jn 4:10
repeats this phraseology in both
versions.
The main different theological views about
atonement are therefore:
Expiation = to pay the penalty for,
to make amends
Propitiation = appeasing an angry God
by removing the sin
|